Our presentation would have gone about eight times smoother if we had downloaded our slides before the presentation. Additionally, there had to have been a way to execute the project so that we could have done it completely within Pinterest. These things could have been done if there had been a little more foresight on our behalf.

Our major challenge was finding peer reviewed sources for anything besides the positive/negative effects of pinterest. Even its history had to be pulled from non-academic sources. Even the sources we found that usually would have been considered reliable were oddly unofficial. The Forbes article was written based on an oral presentation given by the founder, but I could not find the presentation itself anywhere. Though now that I think about it, I never even tried to look for a transcript, so maybe this was within our control.

One of  the things that were cool about presenting pinterest is that all of our sources were linked on our pinboards. We could "make" pins and add the links. Pinterest also allowed us to organize things by category for our presentation which was nice, as well. If only we could put the things in each category in better order!

Of the other presentations, I really thought the Instagram groups was cleverly executed as it was all contained within instagram. I felt their examples were relevant and interesting. The YouTube group had a LOT of information, but I personally didn't like how everything was in videos. Like the concept was neat, but I can watch videos anywhere. The twitter was nicely executed, I just wished that there had been more information, less repetition words, if that makes sense? Like I would be listening, then reading and I would be reading essentially the same thing. I like lots of pictures, not so much words, haha!

Anyway, this class was indeed FAR less horrible than my last honors seminar!! In fact I enjoyed it. I felt like the workload was a bit much, with all three posts in addition to whatever prep work we had, but I don't feel like I was necessarily wasting my time.

Best of luck!! :)

#EndSlacktivism

I'm super guilty of engaging in slacktivism. I had the "I stand with France" FB Profile filter, and I attempted the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge, and so on.

In high school I was much better at following up my actions with words. I was extremely active in the Key Club and if I didn't like something I changed it. I've grown much more complacent as a college student.

Both of my roommates are completely unafraid and very eager to attend protests and rallies for causes they feel strongly about. Perhaps my issue is that I simply don't feel strongly enough to be willing to do something to change it.

All it takes for evil to happen is for good people to stand aside and let it. Slacktivisim can become more than just useless- it can become dangerous. Because good people think they ARE doing things to thwart evil. They think their "actions" have an effect. If you go on social media and spout your beliefs and spread them around, okay, that's fine. But most people with opposing opinions will not be turned to your side by a sing passionate post, or even a series of passionate posts.

Talk is cheap. It's time for action.

If GoFundMe is the new age of begging, then why are people so much more willing to support those than the people on the street? Why are they any less manipulative? Why are they anymore worthy?

Look, I'm not trying to tell you how to use your money. I just want to know how the thought process works.

I'm a selfish individual, and I have been told I am not compassionate enough. Which perhaps there is some merit to. But I find it foolish to give people money for causes that are stupid. I also find it interesting that these platforms censor what you can campaign for.

Like there's one site that prevents you from funding an abortion. What if it is a medically required abortion that your insurance won't pay for? I'm pretty sure that is one of the few cases that abortion is legal across entire country. To me placing such a ban is stupid. If I can make a campaign for my sock fund, let them make one for something that could literally save their life.

I feel compelled to point out that while I am pro-choice, I also do not personally thing abortion is something I can truly condone or choose. But others should still have that choice, because it is their life, too.

Anyway, on to Zuckerburg. He's intelligent, as in a booksmart way, but DANG he's making a fool of himself. Like PLEASE friend, stop talking. I'm just honestly really surprised at how the whole thing is going...

Public Shaming has been around as long as society has existed. People getting placed in the Stocks and being pelted with fruit. The stoning of adulterers. The Scarlet "A", also for adulterers. In Huntington, it is still legal to beat your wife, as long as it is on the steps of the court house.

"Psychologists say that children don't respond to beatings" - Lots of People

They do respond, but not necessarily in the right ways or for the right reason. If your child harasses another child about their hair, then a spanking does nothing. If you explain to them why harassing other kids about their hair is not an acceptable behavior, that would be much more effective. Better yet, ask the child why, WITHOUT guiding or accusing, it is unacceptable behavior.

I don't think I will personally spank my children. I don't think that's the most effective parenting strategy. Every child is unique, and will require a unique brand of parenting. There simply isn't a "one size fits all" parenting solution.

Everyone can find someone like them on the internet. This can often be a good thing- think philanthropy, or connecting the marginalized. Think of Simon Spier, from the movie Love, Simon. If you don't know, it is essentially about a closeted gay high schooler falling in love with a fellow closeted gay classmate online. It's very cute, and only possible because of social media.

The degree of anonymity, or at least the degree perceived makes people braver. It allows them to express themselves more freely, or at least parts of them. Like Simon, a gay boy in a primarily straight pretty small town. While he felt like his family would be fine if he came out, he felt like he'd be changing how everyone saw him if he did. So he played it straight.

However there is also a dark side to this, naturally. The Nasties can connect. The rapists, pedophiles, and criminals can get in touch, too. And if there are others like you- whole communities of them- well, perhaps you are not so Nasty after all. Perhaps such behaviors are normal.

Like I said, this can be a good thing. But polarization, which is what happens when the same ideas are reinforced repeatedly, is rarely a good thing. It is how people end up enemies over differences in opinion that to others seem rather insignificant.

This polarization is what leads to that mob mentality that was discussed in Here Comes Everybody. This can lead to some insane productivity, like the maintenance of Wikipedia. But far more often they gather and "shame" people, like that woman on the flight to Africa. Like WHOA that escalated SO quickly!!! And so violently! I bet there are still people who send her regular threats. I am not condoning or even defending her tweet- it was a joke made in poor taste that she will regret the rest of her life.

As someone who has made similarly stupid mistakes and statements, I can sympathize to a certain degree. Owning up to your mistake and apologizing is all you can do. But she was on a plane, and unable to even realize what a fool hardy joke she had made. By the time she had landed, the situation had progressed past the point of her apology meaning anything. Yes she made her bed, so she needs to lie in it. But GEEZ, let her get up and apologize. I'm assuming the best and that she was indeed making fun of white privilege as she claimed, and not actually being racist.

One statement shouldn't ruin your life. Perhaps make it unpleasant for a bit. But I have to believe that humanity is better than that overall. Otherwise, I'm not sure I'd be able to continue on my current path. I chose chemistry because I want to help people. If people are not worth helping, I couldn't stand it.

Back in my door-slamming phase, I would get in BIG trouble for slamming said doors. One time my dad straight up removed the door from its hinges. He told me that privacy was a privilege, and I had just lost it for a week. Most people treat privacy as a right. But I'm more inclined to agree with my father. If you post everything on social media, you forfeit any nonexistent right you have to privacy in terms of that information,

That's not to say it's morally acceptable to go through all your roommates things. Or break the lock on your brother's diary and read it. But privacy is an extension of trust. And trust has to be earned, I'm told. There's a basic level of trust and privacy that comes for granted until given reason to revoke it. 

But privacy is a privilege you can grant yourself, to a certain extent. Lock that diary up. Keep no physical records of your marital affairs. Keep your thoughts off your facebook page. Not to mention the less people know of you and your schedule, the less easy a target you will be for ill will. Thieves know when you're on vacation- because you posted it on Facebook. People you've wronged know that they can trigger an allergic reaction by wearing a certain perfume- because you posted it on Facebook. And that job you didn't get? It's probably that photo you posted of your new bong or something equally frowned upon.

Essentially, if you want to complain about people knowing too much about you- chances are it's your own damn fault.

If the internet is a social gathering, it is a Masquerade Ball. Everyone is presenting their best selves, and some choose to don a mask. At the Internet's Masquerade Ball, everyone only displays what they want others to see (or what they think others want to see). Some people do this to the extent of hiding their identity.

These are the catfishes. Some have evil/manipulative intentions, others without malice. A social minority may wish to express their views but feel that they cannot without risking their health, relationships or livelihood. Specifically those such as members of the LGTB+ community. While I am the sort of person to cut off those who disapprove of me, even I have those Great Aunts who think I should wear long skirts and marry young. But I still want that birthday check, so I keep my very feminist views in check on my social media.

I suppose my point is that while I personally think that honesty is the best policy, and if people don't like you for who you are, cut them off; catfishing is not inherently a bad thing. If I meet someone online, friend or otherwise, I am fully aware that my expectations of them are not going to be entirely fulfilled. If I go to meet 22 year old Jane and find out she's a 60 year old Jacob trying to manipulate younger women, yes I will be very mad! But if 22 year old Jane is living as a 22 year old Jacob who is a closeted trans girl, I will be significantly less so. I'll be very mad initially, but I'll get over it. Or not, in which case I'm not worth the time and effort they were putting into the friendship.

For me, escaping into the world of fiction (books, games, etc) is enough. But I also am generally happy with who I am and what is going on in my life. I have people who love me unconditionally, both in my family and my friends. I am not a homosexual in a homophobic town with no way to relocate, or a young Christian trapped in an area where religion is looked down upon. It must be liberating to finally express your views, protected by a fake identity.

If the only place you can be your true self is online, go for it. Chances are, you never hurt anyone by being you. We are all already fabricating our online presence by picking and choosing what we post. We even do it to an extent in real life. Catfishing is just one step further.

But I genuinely wish that if you catfish for the reason that you are not accepted in the real world, that you do find someone who accepts and loves you for who you truly are. Someone who sees you without your mask and still loves you all the same.

I am fascinated by the ideas of social media serial killers. There is an episode of Criminal Minds where the perpetrator finds his victims on social media and he befriends them online and eventually kills them. Then, he makes a blog post, JUST LIKE THIS ONE, detailing her death and presenting it as fiction.

DUN DUN DUN... Anyway he gets caught.

As a forensic gal, the topic of bad guys on the web is very interesting to me, though I confess I know little about it. The dark web is essentially that shady warehouse in he middle of nowhere that every one knows exists and houses the black market, but no one legitimate actually knows where it is. It is where sociopaths and serial killers swap stories, sell children, sex slaves, and other horrible goods and services.

But that is the future, and not the NOW. But to be quite honest I'm running out of things to say about Fake news and filter bubbles. They are epidemics that need quashed, but it's going to be very difficult to do so.

My mother once told me a story about a news station that pranked its audience by tellling them that the spaghetti trees had yielded very little that season. It was BBC on April Fool's in 1957, I just found the wiki page. Anyway, a TON of people believed the broadcast and the results were quite dramatic.

This wasn't exactly fake news, but it sure was spreading misinformation. For those of you unaware, spaghetti does not grow from trees. It is made from wheat. This misinformation game is nothing new. In fact, I doubt this was even the first case of such a prank. We've let it get so much worse as the years have gone by, no longer is it an amusing joke. An now we must lie in the bed we have made.

One of the most universal values that make a society is very basic: integrity. There are of course other, very common, very important values, but I choose to focus on this. Without integrity, there is no trust. With no trust there are no relationships. With no relationships there is no commerce, no community, no government- no reason to care what happens to the others around you.

Integrity as we know it has been compromised. When you must fact check every piece of news that you come across, there is no trust in the reporters and thus the media. The only way to truly know what happened is to witness it all yourself. And I have no desire to witness many of the things that are going in the world. I don't want to witness slavery, rape, murder, abuse or racism. I want to read about how the political situation that surround them. I want to hear about successes and failures in combatting them. I want to be told the facts as they are, as unbiased as possible, and be able to form my own opinion.

The media is supposed to be able to keep us in the loop with world events, and keep us on the pulse of our government. But sloppiness is becoming frighteningly common, as these companies strive to report first rather than accurately. To be human is to err, is how the saying goes. But that is where your fellow humans are supposed to come in and you cover each other's errs. For a reporter, an editor, a fact checker or a fellow reporter can easily come to your aid. It is what they are paid to do. All parties involved are failing if it passes through the chain of review that we as consumers have been lead to believe exists for all this time. Perhaps they did exist once, and have gone by the wayside since. Even ignoring the inaccurate news passed on day by day, there are "internet trolls" and also just genuinely manipulative people that want to spread lies and misinformation.

Naturally, I want to believe the best in humans. I'm sure most people do, deep down. But when we know that people are misinforming us, not even out of malice, how can we expect the truth? How can we trust?

As much as I advocate for expanding your horizons, You'd think I'd actively try and seek out things beyond my filter bubble. I do, to a certain extent but only as far as making sure I am consuming accurate information. My fellow liberals seem to dislike if I analyze certain social movements too deeply. I mean I guess if you just want to stand on blind faith, that's fine, but I am really bad at following blindly. You can ask my church groups. But I find that when I begin to analyze, things are not as they seem, and more often than not, I find I don't like what I find.  Practicing what you preach is important, but I almost want to argue that being fully aware of all the facts and what/who you are endorsing is more so.

Which brings me to our topic of the week: biased and fake news. If you do research on a movement and such, I feel like it's more difficult than ever to find fact-based non-biased articles. Honestly, and this really tweaks me, this applies even to the sciences! Science is supposed to be entirely fact based, and I do understand that there is such thing as expectancy bias, but REALLY. SCIENCE SHOULD NOT HAVE A POLITICAL AGENDA.

But that is just my opinion. The opinion of a naive undergraduate student.

Missing the class this week was enormously inconvenient- I'm not sure what all I missed. The readings were fascinating, though I'm not sure how much I can truly understand them, because I don't feel like I can relate to them.

I'm specifically referring to Revolution 2.0, when he puts just about everything else second to supporting his political figure online. This is of particular interest because the idea that so much can be coordinated and organized online, it's so, well, mind blowing! Perhaps I've just not been in severe enough of a situation that I'd be persuasive enough to have any sort of impact, or on the other end, that I'm susceptible to that sort of influence. The idea of the Silent Stand was so. powerful. I could see so many people participating in it if it were suggested by the right person, but I'd still have to be specifically asked in person to go.

It must be such an overwhelming feeling, to feel as though what you say has enough influence to nudge a people toward social and political reform. At your personal request, people you've never met are moved toward action. This is the true power of social media. This is the power that people like Kim Kardashian have and absolutely waste. The power that is used not to influence the people toward the "right" course of action, instead to influence them to buy make up and those sorts of products (which have their place). 

Not to say that celebrities and You Tubers are doing anything necessarily wrong, but simply that they are not making full use of the tools at their disposal. After all, individuals are entitled to not sharing their opinions. And though that's one of the wonderful things about the internet, it's not a requirement.

I really do think my attention span has been shortened since I became an avid social-media user. I used to sit and read for hours upon hours. Now I do good to get through a TV episode. It's really quite pathetic to think about.

But what is interesting is that I've been thinking about this more and more since class- my attention has remained on the topic of its noticeably shorter span, which I find fascinating.  The other thing that really struck me as odd is that I don't want let my attention to focus on certain things for too long. Like serious thinking. I don't want to evaluate my own actions and hold myself accountable. I don't want to start feeling emotions about things I deem "unnecessary".

But if I think about that, about what I find "unnecessary", I discover that the things I don't want to think about are the things I should absolutely be thinking about. That I absolutely should have emotions about. And my denial of myself these feelings is not terribly healthy. But at the same time, if I do think about them, and find myself in need of change... Well, that is why ultimately, whether I want to think about them or not, I do think about such things. Long and hard, and what I hope is thoroughly.

This seems to have gone a bit off topic, but I think this was important for me to explore with myself. Social media helps me to define myself and my viewpoints on certain topics (not that I see them and just adopt them as my own, but that they influence how I might specifically define it). And when the social media reveals a contradiction in my own beliefs, that is one of those things I don't want to think about but really should.

On this lovely Friday, I have been contemplating the permanence of my own existence.

What do others remember of me? Good things, I should hope. But regardless, memories fade. I will be "that girl who did ____" eventually, at least to most people. I do not wish to be forgotten, and it's long been one of my biggest fears.

I suppose this is what could be called an existential crisis.

My online accounts will exist as long as the servers are not cleaned out, and as long as the website exists. If Facebook were to go under, all of the pieces of my life there would be gone. The phrase "Pics or it didn't happen" frightens me because I don't really post all that many, and if those that ARE there were to disappear, much of my digital records of my social life would be gone forever, not to mention my only way of contacting a significant number of people.

If for no other reason than that my connection to so many would be severed I will continue to utilize Facebook.

This is my world now. Rather small, isn't it?

Ah well, I'm rather small, too.

There are so many people on the internet and social media. And I am just one. I do not live anywhere spectacular, or do anything particularly fascinating. And yet, I have eight hundred friends on Facebook. Eight hundred people who want to, or at some point wanted to, know about me and my life.

And here I am, on an empty blog that almost no one will ever see, and I feel much more relevant.

I know that every time I open a new account, I open one more pathway to steal my identity. But why would I be chosen? Why am I any more appealing to identity thieves than anyone else.  Why are those eight hundred people friends with me rather than someone more interesting.

For me, this is the appeal of social media. It is why I continue to use Facebook. It is why I occasionally post on Instagram. It makes me feel interesting, and allows me to make others feel interesting.

Of course, social media is a tool. It is a sword, and depending on the knight holding it, it can fight for justice or puppies, or it could fight for injustice and spread horrible ideas. And depending on who is watching the knight, they will see it to support their own views, or to attack it.

I suppose rather than making me think critically about the tool itself, I think more of its relevance to me, and how it can further or harm my ideas.